|
|
|
|
Hall Of Famer
Joined
April 09 |
|
|
|
3/11/2010 5:29:00 PM
come on sting... just retire... please....
Quote: Im a sarcastic perverted tourist robbing Australian convict
|
|
|
|
Hall Of Famer
Joined
June 08 |
|
|
|
3/11/2010 5:50:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by StoneColdSpider
come on sting... just retire... please....
I second that, reminds me of Flair, Taker. He doesnt know when to quit.
Quote: If you can read or speak, you can rap. Rock actually takes talent
|
|
|
3/11/2010 7:49:00 PM
Sting Hogan and Ric Flair can have a wheelchair match.
I can see Them all in their restbeds, trying to thumbwrestle each other and have it on TV lol
|
|
|
United States
Champion
Joined
July 09 |
|
|
|
3/11/2010 7:56:00 PM
It should only take him a month at the most to fully recover from shoulder surgery - unlike Taker who desperately requires more surgery. Sting did more in the ring than Taker has in a single match in the last year.
Quote: A non-convict Aussie from Adelaide!!!
|
|
|
3/11/2010 8:14:00 PM
I honestly do not care if them older guys still wrestle. They just need to have the younger guys fight each other more and have more air time. Them old guys can wrestle like for an opener or a mid match, but just for a 3-5 minute match.
TNA has soo much younger talents. Them older guys should be trying to push them, by having them young guys win over the older ones.
WWE should have already pushed for a new Champ and storyline.
Example MVP should be champ already on Smackdown
Christian should be IC US champ for now
Swagger should be going for the gold on raw
The Miz should be champ, to continue that "In your face Cena, I beat you " story bit
Well yall get what I mean.
|
|
|
Heavy Weight
Champion
Joined
June 08 |
|
|
|
3/12/2010 6:30:00 AM
omfg... here we go again... time to bring some people back from the fairy world of tna marks and return you to reality... lets just take a look at these old guys over 40 and see exactly how they stack up...
tna... hulk hogan, jeff jarrett, kevin nash, kurt angle, mick foley, nasty boy knobs, nasty boy sags, raven, ric flair, sting, and scott hall...
The WWE... batista, shawn michaels, william regal, triple h, goldust, kane, kung fu naki, and the undertaker.
if you look straight up at the talent listed above... tna only has 3 of their old guys that can still go... jarrett, sting and angle... the rest have constantly embarrassed themselves in the ring... and sting and jarrett have had a ton of time off...
the WWE has goldust and funaki that are jobbers... regal and kane who can still go, but are underused... the other guys are injury prone... but are still main eventers... each has put on some really good matches... they are not all "great" anymore... but by all means dont embarrass themselves... and that includes the taker, who is absolutely injury prone, and barely held together anymore...
but the comment that was the most absurd thing i have ever heard?... "Sting did more in the ring than Taker has in a single match in the last year."... how f*cking stupid can that be?... in the last year... taker had a great feud with cm punk, with many quality matches... did fine against big show and batista to close out 2009... held his own against rey mysterio... and certainly was respectable in the elimination chamber... lets not forget his feud with shawn michaels this year... which will produce at worst a good match... and one year ago had the match of the year with shawn michaels at wm25... let me repeat that... match of the year...
so... even with the taker being in rough shape... how exactly again did he not do better than sting?... lets just make this easy... he didnt... sting is doing pretty good for his age... but not that good...
if sting is not healthy... then he shouldnt be in the ring... he is one of the few guys tna has that actually has name value and can put on a decent match... rushing him back for a not well thought out heel turn can easily backfire... more importantly... the guy is 50 years old... and surgery takes time to heal, and even more for old guys... but in typical tna fashion... if you are old you get tv time... and lots of it... which certainly doesnt help the future of your company to ride out your success based on a 61 year old, 56 year old and 50 year old... but folks... thats tna logic...
Quote: come on sith... be a man... i dare you to respond... http://www.impactwrestling.com/Content.aspx?ID=33522
|
|
|
|
Jobber
Joined
November 09 |
|
|
|
3/12/2010 8:04:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by __STFU__
omfg... here we go again... time to bring some people back from the fairy world of tna marks and return you to reality... lets just take a look at these old guys over 40 and see exactly how they stack up...
tna... hulk hogan, jeff jarrett, kevin nash, kurt angle, mick foley, nasty boy knobs, nasty boy sags, raven, ric flair, sting, and scott hall...
The WWE... batista, shawn michaels, william regal, triple h, goldust, kane, kung fu naki, and the undertaker.
if you look straight up at the talent listed above... tna only has 3 of their old guys that can still go... jarrett, sting and angle... the rest have constantly embarrassed themselves in the ring... and sting and jarrett have had a ton of time off...
the WWE has goldust and funaki that are jobbers... regal and kane who can still go, but are underused... the other guys are injury prone... but are still main eventers... each has put on some really good matches... they are not all "great" anymore... but by all means dont embarrass themselves... and that includes the taker, who is absolutely injury prone, and barely held together anymore...
but the comment that was the most absurd thing i have ever heard?... "Sting did more in the ring than Taker has in a single match in the last year."... how f*cking stupid can that be?... in the last year... taker had a great feud with cm punk, with many quality matches... did fine against big show and batista to close out 2009... held his own against rey mysterio... and certainly was respectable in the elimination chamber... lets not forget his feud with shawn michaels this year... which will produce at worst a good match... and one year ago had the match of the year with shawn michaels at wm25... let me repeat that... match of the year...
so... even with the taker being in rough shape... how exactly again did he not do better than sting?... lets just make this easy... he didnt... sting is doing pretty good for his age... but not that good...
if sting is not healthy... then he shouldnt be in the ring... he is one of the few guys tna has that actually has name value and can put on a decent match... rushing him back for a not well thought out heel turn can easily backfire... more importantly... the guy is 50 years old... and surgery takes time to heal, and even more for old guys... but in typical tna fashion... if you are old you get tv time... and lots of it... which certainly doesnt help the future of your company to ride out your success based on a 61 year old, 56 year old and 50 year old... but folks... thats tna logic...
I yield back the reminder of my time. haha. Your Sting/Taker comparison is dead on with no need for debate.
Quote: Human arrogance fortifies human ignorance.
|
|
|
|
Hall Of Famer
Joined
February 10 |
|
|
|
3/12/2010 8:15:00 AM
What's up with all these tag team main events? This goes for both WWE and TNA. Can we please start getting some more singles matches. Or if you have a tag team match, have the teams competing in it actually be a real tag team--i.e., have them actually be in contention for the tag championships.
And Hardy vs Styles... I've never been crazy about either one of these two but I won't judge until after the spotfest.
Quote: And we was contemplating Baba///William Blake and the Eternals/Going down to the Sisters of Mercy/Looking for the Veedon Fleece
|
|
|
|
Hall Of Famer
Joined
April 09 |
|
|
|
3/12/2010 9:18:00 PM
wait what?? there are tag team titles??? where??? how??? since when??? :P
Quote: Im a sarcastic perverted tourist robbing Australian convict
|
|
|
